The charts below show that UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts reveal the number of graduates and postgraduates who did not engage in full-time work after graduation in UK in 2008. Overall, it is obvious that the number for further study was the largest, whereas that for voluntary work was the minimum no matter for graduates or postgraduates.
For graduate students, the most conspicuous pattern is that most of them chose to involve in further academic learning, accounting 29,665 students. As to part-time jobs and unemployment, they shared similar figures with 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. In contrast, those participating in voluntary jobs only accounted 3,500, which was incredibly less than others.
As to the destination of postgraduate student, the whole amount is much less than that of graduates, but the largest number was still taken up by those continuing study (2,725). Followed by the figure for part-time work (2,535), it was merely 190 less than the top one. However, unemployed postgraduates (1,625) was roughly one tenth of unemployed graduates, and this pattern was also reflected by the amount of voluntary workers (345 postgraduate students).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he number of graduates and postgraduates who did not engage in full-time work aft...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, whereas, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98117371084 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607954545455 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7316265254 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146626190925 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760386971808 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117444103644 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108074451829 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876555938601 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.