The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps not only reveal the current layout of the centre of a small town called Islip, but also suggest its projection in the future. Overall, it is notable that there will be more facilities constructed in the planned development.
Referring to the current distribution, the town centre is connected by a main road, which will be demolished in the future plan. Besides, there are several shops distributed by the both sides of the main road, to which, the north is occupied by countryside area and the south is taken by place of residence. To each end of side paths from the main road, there are a school and a large park.
As to the transporting projection, the town centre will be circled by a dual carriageway, and a pedestrian street will replace the space for the current main road. In addition, a couple of shops will be dismantled and make place for the projected bus station and car park.
For other facilities not mentioned, two residential areas will be added respectively by the pedestrian street, and the construction need to lessen the space for original park. Last but not least, a large shopping centre will be constructed by the north of walking street.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78048780488 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76312938489 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521951219512 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.292856399 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.888888889 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177170052266 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816949538882 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604012068751 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121699703484 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676383487412 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.