The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart suggests the total amount of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls which are separated into 3 types in the UK between 1995 and 2002. Overall, it is obvious that time consumed by local - fixed line was the largest, while that taken by mobile phones was the smallest over the 7-year period.
For phone calls occupied by local fixed line, the whole trend rose in the first 4 years, and then reported a decline from 1999 to 2002. The amount of minutes started from 70 billions in 1995 and reached its summit by roughly 20 billions up to 90 billions in 1999, before finally falling back to its beginning quantity by the end of the chart.
By comparison, the tendency for domestic and international fixed line reported a gradual increasing pattern all the time. Starting as less than 40 billion minutes in 1995, the phone time climbed steadily in the following years and reached to approximately 60 billion minutes in 2002.
Not mentioned is the figure for mobiles, it reveals the similar rising tendency compared with that for national and international fixed calls, albeit to different numbers. The time was merely less than 5 billion minutes at the starting point and grew slowly before 2000. However, the soaring speed accelerated during the following period (the number was around 40 billion at last).
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91031390135 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4684512865 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587443946188 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6325352122 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221064578995 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968458491712 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937661336986 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141306521137 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519788027377 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.