Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
A survey suggests that 67% of domestic waste was not fully recycled in my hometown Wuxi in 2017. This might derive from the prevalent use of disposable products, but some people think that it is due to no compulsory measure taken by local government so it is a necessity for administrations to enact relevant laws. From my point of view, laws could be effective regarding to the recycle of waste, yet some other measures could be helpful either.
To begin with, there is no doubt that making it an obligation for individuals to recycle waste would be the most efficient way. In fact, statistics reveal that the proportion of the product reuse has risen dramatically since government set up certain rules and regulations in Taiwan. In other words, citizens there are likely to pay penalty fees if they disobey the recycling laws, so they have to sort their garbage and collect those reusable products. In short, enhancing legislation related to recycling would improve current situation effectively.
Nevertheless, it would be so spontaneous for people to make enough use of domestic waste after enacting laws, and I think establishing a rewarding system might be more optimistic. What I’m trying to say is that communities could encourage people to collect those renewable products throughout offering them prizes and rewards. Therefore, dwellers in certain communities might be willing to help gather useful waste. For example, most place of residence has this service to exchange paper boxes for money in China and people are prone to take actions. Briefly, situation tends to be ameliorated if there’s a rewarding system about recycling.
In conclusion, measures linking to legislation would have positive effects when it comes to encouraging people to recycle, but it would be more helpful if people take actions out of their own willingness. There is also an old saying in China goes ‘Actions will be better when stemming from personal mind’.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ge and collect those reusable products. In short, enhancing legislation related to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, in short, no doubt, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21698113208 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87845117926 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600628930818 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1223257104 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264873683435 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826138614078 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053132585646 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153970558995 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329369245843 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.