The bar chart below illustrate the activities that graduate and post graduate students did without considering those who were successful in securing a full-time job in the UK by the year 2008.
According to the first chart, a majority of graduates intended to follow their study in high level (2965 persons), although they slightly were fond of voluntary works (only 3500 persons). Part-time work was moderately popular among graduates, hence, 177350 of them attracted to it, while the number of unemployment was approximately over 15000 (16235 persons).
On the other hand, the conditions of the postgraduates were not diverse in comparison with graduates. Similarly, the number of those who pursued their study was the pick one with 2725 persons and part-time job was following by 1535 enthusiasts. Besides, voluntary work was again the last alternative and accounted for just 345 persons among postgraduates, though the unemployment was 1625 person.
TO sum UP, it is distinctively manifest that the number of graduates that did not benefit a full-time job was significantly more than postgraduates. Not only were they rather to get superior degree, but they were also motivated in pa-t time work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...uates, though the unemployment was 1625 person. TO sum UP, it is distinctively mani...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were also motivated in pa-t time work.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, similarly, so, thus, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31413612565 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97715689419 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638743455497 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.596012026 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180338799255 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833402236275 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796347243508 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129678034999 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891550527538 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.