The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned bar graphs illustrate the information about the graduate and postgraduate students of United Kingdom who involved in different types of work rather than doing full-time jobs in 2008.
Overall, as is represented by the bar graphs further study accounted the highest number of both graduated and post graduated students while the students who did voluntary work was comparatively very low during 2008 in United Kingdom.
It is evident that the figure of postgraduates and graduates in 2008 who did further study were dominant among all others with the numbers of 2725 and 29665 respectively whereas the number of students engaged in voluntary work after graduation was considerably high(3500) while postgraduates accounted the lowest number 345 only.
Moreover, the part-time workers in 2008 were mostly the postgraduates (2535) in contrast graduates had subsequently low figure of 17735. In addition, graduates were highly unemployed even after graduation (16235) but the significantly higher number of post graduates were involved in any of activities. Furthermore, only 1625 postgraduates were unemployed during 2008.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70588235294 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0489887143 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.7142718393 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.666666667 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246547766076 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131443725228 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511016516424 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165802211388 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287713658225 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 61.2550243902 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.