The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The two charts showed the destination percentage in four categories of UK graduates and postgraduates in 2008, who did not have full-time job after graduation.
As clearly seen in the two tables, both graduates and postgraduates students saw a similar destination proportion that the majority would seek for further study, followed by part-time work. However, the total amount of people of UK graduates in each category were far more than that of postgraduates.
As of graduates’ destination, about a third of students chose to study further, amounted to 29,665, while the others went for part-time work or unemployment, both of which nearly leveled at 17,000 people, leaving a very small number of only 3,500 people taking part in voluntary work.
Even though postgraduates saw the similar proportion, its number of people in each categories were far behind graduates.
Those who sought for further study accounted for only 2,725, slightly more than those taking part-time job. The third population stayed unemployed, accounted for 1,625 headcount, and the least population was in voluntary work, with only 345 people in total.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...tes in 2008, who did not have full-time job after graduation. As clearly seen in...
^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h categories were far behind graduates. Those who sought for further study accou...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'so', 'third', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236180904523 0.268076937826 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.120603015075 0.116061578633 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0954773869347 0.0759168565197 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.070351758794 0.0366838410393 192% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00502512562814 0.0131127313244 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.170854271357 0.155750635184 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0251256281407 0.0379272487307 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94656896287 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0100502512563 0.0210936926555 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0954773869347 0.0948980150116 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00502512562814 0.00437022459523 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150753768844 0.00967000014798 156% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1141.0 1161.00487805 98% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.9 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.41011235955 5.90752243213 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.398876404494 0.337110787985 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280898876404 0.247514529752 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224719101124 0.171178102325 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174157303371 0.112407865282 155% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94656896287 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.546246751206 112% => OK
Word variations: 57.3008850122 49.3433353143 116% => OK
How many sentences: 7.0 8.93414634146 78% => OK
Sentence length: 25.4285714286 23.0094962315 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.196009401 42.9750493124 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.0 135.714022679 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 23.0094962315 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.689975730869 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.84146341463 130% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.48048780488 135% => OK
Readability: 53.518459069 47.7609492067 112% => OK
Elegance: 2.20512820513 2.94281807926 75% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.418131533498 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145856962414 0.181151798455 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0802791386383 0.0850326197045 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.810765601638 0.706616315825 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.167301296613 0.157042692854 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.228904883108 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.108899403657 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.232628614243 0.367819155151 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108162139637 0.0812612215331 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.316326947829 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0921553760075 0% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70731707317 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.08536585366 98% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.16585365854 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 74.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.