The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The bar charts illustrate the number of graduate and postgraduate students who involved in different activities except full-time work after leaving college in 2008.
overall, it can be seen that the number of UK graduates who did several activities after leaving college was higher than postgraduate students for all categories.
From the charts, it is evident that there was the almost same difference between the part-time and unemployment category for both graduate and postgraduate students. 17735 graduate students involved in part-time work, as opposed to 2535 postgraduate students. Similarly, The number of graduate students who were unemployed was higher than for postgraduate students, at 16235 and 1625 respectively.
Voluntary work was preferred more by graduates student as 3500 graduates were seen to do voluntary work, as compared to only 345 postgraduates for that work. In the further study category, 29655 graduate students and 2,725 postgraduate students engaged to study in 2008, which was the highest difference in all categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...work after leaving college in 2008. overall, it can be seen that the number of UK g...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'graduates'' or 'graduate's'?
Suggestion: graduates'; graduate's
... Voluntary work was preferred more by graduates student as 3500 graduates were seen to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68553459119 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02218109596 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5498243894 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386430894124 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202325770371 0.103423049105 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109664023956 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274097049904 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958808835393 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.