The charts below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls, in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar charts compares the duration of telephone calls, in billion minutes, for three different groups between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, the duration of local calls on landlines remain at the peak throughout the period, despite fluctuating. The other two groups' timing experienced varying degrees of increase from 1995 to 2002; with mobile calls always at the least.
A fluctuation was observed in the number of local call minutes on fixed line over the years, then progressed minimally with average of 5 minutes per year until 1999 when it reached zenith of 90. Thereafter, a slight but steady fall was seen for the rest of the period; although it was above others with a wide margin for most of the years.
Conversely, the remaining two categories followed a similar pattern. Starting at over 30 billions in 1995, national landline calls duration grew steadily to end at about 62. Likewise, a negligible growth was recorded for all mobile calls from less than 10 in 1995 to approximately 12 in 1999. The rest of the years then saw a significant jump to 45 billion minutes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...res the duration of telephone calls, in billion minutes, for three different groups bet...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...average of 5 minutes per year until 1999 when it reached zenith of 90. Thereafter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, likewise, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90217391304 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62132360252 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0414713118 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125420495514 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052678042889 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604617479652 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922092741749 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666213996353 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.