The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided column chart and table illustrate the amount of several categories transported abroad in one country measured in billions of dollars in 2015-2016 period.
At first glance, petroleum products contributed the highest figure among the five types of exported sorts, while least textiles were transported oversea throughout this period.
It is noticeable that there were the highest value belonged to petroleum products, which went up by 3 billion from nearly 61 billion in 2015 to roughly 64 billion in 2016. Also, engineered goods contributed the second rank during this time, which formed approximately 56 billion in 2015 and just over 60 billion in the next year. By contrast, only about 25 billion and over 31 billion of textiles between 2015 and 2016, which was responsible for the smallest amount of various categories.
Looking at the column chart and table in more detail, we can see that the greatest disparity after a year went to textiles (15.24%), followed by the second largest gap of engineered goods, at 8.5%. Whereas, the manority of agricultural products in 2015 in comparison with it in 2016, which accounted for only 0.81% changed. On average, the amount of cost of gems and jewelly dipped considerably, which opposite to the general trend, by 5.18% in the whole period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the least'.
Suggestion: while the least
...among the five types of exported sorts, while least textiles were transported oversea throu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, second, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14150943396 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68268116124 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4801733391 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.25 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185434677573 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841848008818 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702928646601 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117957152826 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762430177321 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.