Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways of encouraging employees to work hard
In the current era globalization, whether companies should use the currency for rewarding or other awards has become a contentious topic in many parts of the world. Many people believe that the disadvantages of paying currency to reward outweigh its advantages. Nevertheless, I maintain that not only giving employees extra money can contribute to work productivity but also a variety of different kinds of awards. This essay shall outline the supporting points to explain my own perspective.
To begin with, additional money can be considered as a motivation for workers to strive to further and never be fed up with their tasks at hand. This is due to the fact that only professional achievements, as well as career progression, can result in the future prosperity and good financial health. On top of that, from an economic perspective, apart from social responsibilities, most employees working with a great deal of passion to meet the sole aim of maximizing income. They cannot complete their work effectively and outperform in comparison with their colleagues with feelings of worry about earning a living.
Some people would argue that there are definitely better ways to motivate an employee for an exceptional performance like allowing extended holidays, giving crest, congratulating and praising. Indeed, emotional supports can lead to sustaining one’s work productivity in the long-term. People can put down their burden or improve their levels of knowledge by going on holiday. In addition, workers might feel self-assured by giving crest or compliments. According to an Oxford survey, approximately 75% of authority figures in their companies pay more attention to employees’ spirits.
To sum up, material, especially extra money, and emotional supports play indispensable roles in a competitive atmosphere. I suggest that leaders or bosses should place as important on their workers as on the quality and quantity of products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-25 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | quytnee | 74 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Fedya | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | sheep | 80 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 87
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 84
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, well, apart from, in addition, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44224422442 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16501822236 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656765676568 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1318785278 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226074716254 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062871120347 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408486153924 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120139557317 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496124162655 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.