The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The graphs demonstrate the value of that country's exports in different catagories as well as the rate of change in each items which was calculated by comparing 2016s change with respective to 2015.
Overall, the earning from the export items was increased in comparative to previous year. Because of decrement on business, it witnessed remission in rate of change of export items.

The income from the petroleum products was above 60 billion sterling in both 2015 and 2016 which was the highest rather than other items. However, rate of change in values is just 3%. Engineered goods acquistion second position whose collection was between 50-61 billion sterling and noticeable change of rate was 8.5%.

Approximately 43% billion sterling shared by gems and jewellery as an exports in 2015 which was reduced by 3 billion in 2016. The income of gems and jewel excise by 5.18% in 2016. Not only in 2015 but also in 2016, approximately tantamount amount of money earned from agriculture product whose rate of change was negligible of .8%. On the other hand, textile experienced drastic change of rate equal to 15.24% in order to reach from 30 billion to reach over 40 billion sterling.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00505050505 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6271608798 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6373162276 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196962385821 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092903699124 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594634269254 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144672146393 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578676793852 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.