The three diagrams illustrate about what changes occured at West Park Secondary School since its construction year 1950 to 2010.
Overall, the school experienced plenty of improvement throughout the period. Houses and farmland entirely fade out from sight whose areas' utilized not only by car park but the science block as well.
In 1950, initially houses, farmland, school and playground covered all the areas which were opposite to main road. Car park and science block were constructed within three decades whose area belongs to residential houses in earlier days. Similarly, the sports field appeared in the year 1980 by replacing farmland . There was no further replacement with school(main building) and playground in 1980s.
In 2010, the area of car park extended as a result, it covered all part of sports field. In contrast, playground compressed and certain proportion was used by sports field in 2010. Both school(main block) and science block did not witnessed any enhancement after 1980 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d in the year 1980 by replacing farmland . There was no further replacement with s...
^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...with schoolmain building and playground in 1980s. In 2010, the area of car park extende...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar park extended as a result, it covered all part of sports field. In contrast, p...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'witness'
Suggestion: witness
...oolmain block and science block did not witnessed any enhancement after 1980 to 2010.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, well, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30625 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64921213011 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6375 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.9211521848 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.9 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145814563874 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580956755321 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997970921554 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118794565191 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132838732793 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.