The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie charts demonstrate many sources from which energy is produced in France from 1995 to 2005
Overall, it is apparent that coal and gas collectively made up for more than half of the energy production in both years. Remarkably is the decrease of energy made from petro, which is correspondent with the increase of nuclear and other energy
To begin, the energy generation from gas and coal was roughly even and was not witnessed with any drastic shift through a 10-year period. They together dominated the whole French energy production in 2 years with approximately 30% each. On the other hand, petrol saw a nearly 10% decline in its energy production, from 29.27% to 19.55%
The energy produced from nuclear and other sources always accounted for the least, however, they grew significantly from 1995 to 2005. Specifically, there was about a two-fold growth in other energy generation from 4.90% to 9.10% and around 4% was added to the figure of nuclear
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the increase of nuclear and other energy To begin, the energy generation from gas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63029609592 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.0567482229 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229635171218 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129732267198 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10059658031 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181777627489 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135818881786 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.