The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five types of energy generation in France from 1995 to 2005
Overall, coal and gas were the most significant sources of energy in both years, whereas, nuclear and other kinds of fuel generated the least amount of energy in France. While all types of energy were seen with increases in their production, the petro-generated energy declined significantly in the examined period
In 1995, coal constituted the largest fraction of the whole chart with 29.80%, followed by gas with 29.63%. Ten years later, these energy sources showed only a very steady growth of about a mere 1%, from 29.80% to 30.93% for coal and 29.63% to 30.31% for gas, collectively made up over half the energy production
With regard to the the remaining methods of producing energy, there was an approximate 5%. Increase in production from both nuclear and other sources to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. On the other hand, petro was the only fuel of energy which decreased in production from 29.27% in 1995 to around a fifth ( 19.55% ) in 2005
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 16, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...the energy production With regard to the the remaining methods of producing energy, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 16, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...the energy production With regard to the the remaining methods of producing energy, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on from 29.27% in 1995 to around a fifth 19.55% in 2005
^^
Line 8, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...29.27% in 1995 to around a fifth 19.55% in 2005
^^
Line 8, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1995 to around a fifth 19.55% in 2005
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01123595506 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65905469998 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.688677306 43.030603864 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.4 112.824112599 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240621550979 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128468710731 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742590090376 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164231649493 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782059589854 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.2329268293 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.