The charts provide information about students in 2007 who were happy with
different facilities at a university of UK. Summarise the information by selecting and
reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts show the opinions of undergraduate and postgraduate students on the
different facilities at a university. It can be seen that the satisfaction levels are similar in some
matters and different in others.
Both undergrads and postgraduates had similar feelings about the school rooms at the
university. About 2/3rd of both were very satisfied, a quarter were not satisfied and the
remaining 13-14% each were quite satisfied.
There was a marked difference of opinion regarding University cafeteria. Approximately
3/4th of the postgraduates were very satisfied but only about a half of undergrads were very
satisfied. 16% and 11% of postgraduates were quite satisfied and not satisfied respectively
where as these figures were 22% and 26% respectively. The major discrepancy was regarding
school facilities for which only a small minority (1%) of undergrads was not satisfied but a
quarter (25%) of postgraduates were not satisfied. A vast majority (85%) of undergrads were
very satisfied whereas less than half (43%) postgraduates were very satisfied. 14%
undergrads were quite satisfied but almost a double (32%) postgraduates were quite happy
with school facilities.
Overall, school facilities satisfied the majority of undergrads, university cafeteria was the
favourite of postgraduates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...tisfied and not satisfied respectively where as these figures were 22% and 26% respecti...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75510204082 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35132241548 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8934921297 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.545454545 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 3.83414634146 443% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13638349892 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653660221943 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330610270302 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499600980728 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309421461575 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.