The graph below shows the proportion of four different material that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country .
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant .
The given line graph shows the percentage of four different type of materials recycled between 1982 and 2010. It can clearly seen that plastics materials were least recycled compare to other remaining three materials .
In 1982 , paper and cardboard recycled approximately 65 % and it was highest in 1982 . Glass containers were reproduced nearly 50 % in 1982. The opposite trend is seen in both materials between 1994 and 2010 . In 2010 proportion of recycled paper & cardboard and glass containers were 70 % and 60 % respectively .
Reclining of aluminium cans started in 1986 and it was nearly 5 % . After that it was increased dramatically and reached above 40 % while plastics were reproduced least percentage during the entire period . It was approximately 3 % and below 10 % in 1990 and 2010 respectively .
In overall , paper and cardboard were highest proportion of recycling and in contrast plastics were least during given time period .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...east recycled compare to other remaining three materials . In 1982 , paper an...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...pare to other remaining three materials . In 1982 , paper and cardboard recyc...
^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...remaining three materials . In 1982 , paper and cardboard recycled approximat...
^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ximately 65 % and it was highest in 1982 . Glass containers were reproduced nearly...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... in both materials between 1994 and 2010 . In 2010 proportion of recycled paper &...
^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth materials between 1994 and 2010 . In 2010 proportion of recycled paper & card...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ntainers were 70 % and 60 % respectively . Reclining of aluminium cans started...
^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ns started in 1986 and it was nearly 5 % . After that it was increased dramaticall...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...After that it was increased dramatically and reached above 40 % while plastics we...
^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'reproduced the least'.
Suggestion: reproduced the least
... reached above 40 % while plastics were reproduced least percentage during the entire period . I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...east percentage during the entire period . It was approximately 3 % and below 10 ...
^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... . It was approximately 3 % and below 10 % in 1990 and 2010 respectively . In...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...elow 10 % in 1990 and 2010 respectively . In overall , paper and cardboard we...
^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...0 and 2010 respectively . In overall , paper and cardboard were highest propor...
^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'were the highest'.
Suggestion: were the highest
... . In overall , paper and cardboard were highest proportion of recycling and in contras...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard were highest proportion of recycling and in contrast plastics were least duri...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tics were least during given time period .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38095238095 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9852360861 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544217687075 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8028775489 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249379946717 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10679334615 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766136609387 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157957447924 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838666233733 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.