The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart provided depicts the average number of years spent at school of adult males and females, and the pie charts illustrates the highest education level of adults in Singapore over a period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, it is evdident that the average levels of participation in education of men and women in Singapore from 2000 to 2010 witnessed an upward trend after a period surveyed, and the percentage of highschool qualification ranked in the first in 2000 whereas that of university qualification was the largest in 2010.
As can be seen from the bar chart given, the average number of years spent at school of adult males in Singapore was always higher compared to that of adult females between 2000 and 2010. There was a gradual rise of the figure for men from about 9 years in 2000 to 12 years in 2010. The figure for women showed a stability in 4 years from 2000 to 2004 and increased slightly to reach a peak of almost 9 years in 2010.
As far as the pie charts are concerned, the proportion of master and university qualification of adults in Singapore between 2000 and 2010 witnessed a surge while the opposite was true of the remaining qualifiations. The portion of university and master qualification, which was the two lowest in 2000, leapt and ranked in the first and second in 2010, with merely 32.33% and 30.31%, respectively. The percentage of highschool qualification decreased in 2010 to approximately two in ten (19.55%), which was higher compared to that of secondary school qualification (15.2%). The proportion of primary school qualification shared a minuscule portion, with about 2.1%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The bar chart provided depicts the avera...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010. Overall, it is evdident that the average...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...qualification was the largest in 2010. As can be seen from the bar chart given,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...each a peak of almost 9 years in 2010. As far as the pie charts are concerned, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 575, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f secondary school qualification 15.2%. The proportion of primary school qualificat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85663082437 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89135144116 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.433691756272 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 283.868780488 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.6907363956 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.555555556 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394433461368 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161632330906 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137232627135 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273272568666 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124831023106 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.