the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
Given are the pie chart and the bar chart revealing that the total levels of those who took part in education and the highest level of education changed between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, it is immediately apparent that the number of adult males that participating was much more than the figures of adult females and the gap between them was rising over time. While high school and university were the highest proportion of educational qualifications in 2000 and 2010, master qualification went through the most significant change in the period.
As can be seen from the bar graph, the following 10 years saw minimal growth in adult males, which reached a peak of just under 12% in 2010. During the same period, the number of adult females began to rise from 8% in 2000 and 9% in 2010, which was almost 20% less than that of males.
Regarding the pie chart, it is clear that university and master qualification recorded an exponential growth to around 32,93% and 30,31%, whereas the figures for primary, secondary, and high school all dropped sharply over the period. In fact, primary school qualification declined drastically with just only 2,1%, which was also the lowest percentage in 2010, compared with the highest proportion, nearly 33% of university qualification
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the pie chart and the bar chart reveali...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0046728972 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69204711181 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.3254456366 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5714285714 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301039553444 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134249623857 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126518325406 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195448981963 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141468283127 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.