The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015

The given pie charts compare the 3 ways of learning English language in 3 different countries for year 2010 and 2015.
Overall, majority of learners preferred evening classes while only few individual chose to learn online and Abroad is in between of this both. in 2010, note any people observed to learn by going abroad in country C.
Considering evening classes, country C had more interest in this mode as 94%( which is paramount value in graph) of people was learning via this mode in 2010 and 82% in 2015. Next to them, Country A and country B has almost similar amount which was 70% and 72% respectively. In a span of five year that was declined and reached at 68%(in country A) and 48%(in country B).
Nearly equal proportion of language learner noticed in both country in abroad, where 25% for country A and 20% for country B was listed. Surprisingly, only 3%
In online learning method, two fold growth were there in country A, increasing from 5%(2010) to 10%(2015). Interesting surge was noticed in country B, where in 2010,

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... and Abroad is in between of this both. in 2010, note any people observed to learn...
^^
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to learn by going abroad in country C. Considering evening classes, country C h...
^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost similar amount which was 70% and 72% respectively. In a span of five year tha...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at 68%in country A and 48%in country B. Nearly equal proportion of language lear...
^^^
Line 4, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntry B was listed. Surprisingly, only 3% In online learning method, two fold grow...
^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was noticed in country B, where in 2010,
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69613259669 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52025765867 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9141981994 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339571762339 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159444908136 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10510517487 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217118552191 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11538863927 0.0819641961636 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.