The charts show the share of the Australian and British cinema markets in 2001 and cinema admissions in Britain and Australia from 1980 to 2001
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant
Chart 1 shows the cinema industry's share of the Australia and British market by origin in 2001. in both countries, films made in the USA predominated with 77% of the market in Britain compared to 67% in Australia. British films accounted for 21% of the British cinema market and 6% of the Australia market. On the other hand, while 11% of the films shown in Australia were Australian, no Australia films were shown in Britain. Films from other countries had 16% of the market share in Australia as opposed to just 2% in Britain.
Chart 2 shows cinema admissions in Britain and Australia since 1980. In both countries cinema admissions dropped in the middle of 1980s. In Australia admissions fell from just under 40 million in 1980 to about 30 million in 1984-1986 while in Britain the decrease was far more dramatic ( from 100 million in 1980 to less than 60 million in 1984 ). Since then, however, the industry has recovered both countries. In 2001, cinema admissions in Britain stood at over 150 million, whereas in Australia they reached 90 million.
Overall, the charts show that the cinema has increased in popularity in both countries over last 15 years, but that the origins of films projected in Australia are more diverse than in Britain
- Some people think that art (such as painting and music) does not directly improve quality of people’s life, so the government should spend money on other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 93
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that the people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your 56
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...a and British market by origin in 2001. in both countries, films made in the USA p...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...itain and Australia since 1980. In both countries cinema admissions dropped in the middle...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itain the decrease was far more dramatic from 100 million in 1980 to less than 60...
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... million in 1980 to less than 60 million in 1984 . Since then, however, the indus...
^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...in 1980 to less than 60 million in 1984 . Since then, however, the industry has r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83644859813 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5493124663 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7849807558 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0909090909 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373880548036 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180448179317 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123612221968 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241718252572 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660532803235 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.