The charts show subway and bus ridership and urban population density in 3 cities in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts show the popularity of two different means of public transportation in connection with the population density in three big cities namely London, New York City and Tokyo in the year 2009.
It is clear that citizens living in two cities with the highest and lowest population density (Tokyo and New York City) mostly preferred subway to bus. The opposite was true for London, in which bus was far more popular than subway.
In 2009, Tokyo, the city had the highest population density among 3 mentioned cities, at nearly 6000 people/square kilometer, also witnessed the highest percentage of subway commuters (33.3%). Similarly, New York City’s residents preferred subway to bus, 28.6% of total city population commuted by subway, whereas only 12% of them chose bus. Meanwhile, London, the second highest population density city (around 5000 people/square kilometer), saw a doubled number of people travelling by bus in comparison to 19% for subway ridership.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk City and Tokyo in the year 2009. It is clear that citizens living in two ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s was far more popular than subway. In 2009, Tokyo, the city had the highest...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
... subway, whereas only 12% of them chose bus. Meanwhile, London, the second highest ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78844053628 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.925745768 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286224822008 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153175601793 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455638953134 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198053866481 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343589893374 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.