Given is a bar chart which depicts the comparative data regarding the 3 different reasons of air pollution in 4 countries.
A glance at a graph reveals that there are striking similarities and distinct differences with regard to pollution causes in different countries. In Japan and China industry is the main cause of the air pollution with approximately 40 PPM and 80 PPM respectively after the Transport related pollution with 30 PPM and 70 PPM respectively. At the same territories Electricitiy generation causes less pollution than the others witrh nearly 60 PPM in China and approximately 15 PPM in Japan.
On the other hand, transport produces more air pollution in America with a bit below 60 PPM. While Industry and electricitiy generation creates virtually same amount of pollution with a little above 30 PPM and a bit below 30 PPM respectively.
Nonetheless, Australia is the less polluted one among the given countries with almost same amount of pollution caused by all three causes with approximately 20 PPM. On the contrary, China has the biggest numbers in air pollution chart with the total 210 PPM caused by given activities.
- Nowadays more and more people are having consumer goods like refrigerators and washing machines 89
- while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example 73
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 56
- Some people think that the best way to get the news is through newspapers while others think it is through online media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 76
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nonetheless, regarding, so, while, on the contrary, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10638297872 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08327164813 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2267603525 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242675608474 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137379779156 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649447114129 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175139278239 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696945035788 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.