The charts shows the number of passengers who used three types of public transport in somewhere town from 2012 to 2015.
The bar chart depicts the information about the number of people in thousand who preferred different types of public transport in somewhere town from 2012 to 2015. As an overview, the highest number of travellers travelled by Bus in the first year which replaced by Tram in the last year.
It is clear from the graph that, during 2012 the least number of tourists used Tram for travelling and it accounted as almost 15 thousand, which was further showed increased and observed four times higher in the last year as almost 97 thousand. However, travellers who liked to travelled by Bus noticed as nearly 52 thousand in the 2012 and it declined by 8 thousand in the next year. Further, in 2014 and 2015 bus travellers increased and it recorded as 73 thousand and 50 thousand.
Moving towards the Train, the highest number of passenger preferred to travelled by Train (75 thousand) in the 2012. In contrast, only 10 thousand of masses travelled by Train in 2013, which was further observed with increased and recorded as 53 thousand in the 2015.
To sum up, the number of travellers who travelled by Bus and Tram showed a many variations while, it increased in the case of Train over the time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...formation about the number of people in thousand who preferred different types of public...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as almost 15 thousand, which was further showed increased and observed four tim...
^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 15 thousand, which was further showed increased and observed four times higher...
^^^
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2013, which was further observed with increased and recorded as 53 thousand in...
^^
Line 7, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed a many variations while, it increased in the case of Train over the time perio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56684335464 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3961967634 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237090736915 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123748996555 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142426419941 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161244128687 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107587045022 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.