The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics: The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

fachryadul92's picture

The charts elucidated the comparison of the weight assessment of Charlestown citizens between 1955 and 2015. Overall, in 1995 more than 45% of people in all of the years-old ranges was categorized as an ideal weight. In contrast, in 2015 the percentage of obese weight from 20 to 69 years old gravitate to uplift tremendously.

Furthermore, while in 1995 the percentage of underweight people in all of the years-old ranges reached more than 15% respectively, in 2015 the percentage of underweight which it attained more than 15% just occurred in people under 30 years old range.

On the other hand, while in 2015 the percentage of obese people in the 60-69 years old range reached approximately 60%, in 1995 in the same years old range it just attained less than 10%. Moreover, the percentage of overweight people in 1955 and 2005 had dominated in 30-39 as well as 40-49 years old ranges severally.

Votes: 
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
1 week 1 day ago Kien Vu 78 Read full essay
1 month 3 weeks ago Sagar Gurung 73 Read full essay
2 months 1 week ago cindycornelia98 78 Read full essay
4 months 1 day ago skan 73 Read full essay
5 months 1 week ago fachryadul92 67 Read full essay
6 months 2 weeks ago LyleDUO 84 Read full essay
6 months 2 weeks ago Ketan Raj Poudel 78 Read full essay
9 months 2 weeks ago mrwen00 56 Read full essay
9 months 2 weeks ago mrwen00 56 Read full essay
9 months 2 weeks ago mrwen00 61 Read full essay

Pages

More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...all, in 1995 more than 45% of people in all of the years-old ranges was categorized as an ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the percentage of underweight people in all of the years-old ranges reached more than 15% ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86757583287 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3065036683 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 5.23603664747 274% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120066291992 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904661060742 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805038509189 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990346650926 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633238551512 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages