The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The figure shows the expenditure of fish and some kinds of meat which contains lamb, beef, as well as chicken in European states during 1979 to 2004. Furthermore, the consumption should be measured by grams per person per week.
Generally, throughout two decades most of items lean to decrease slightly. In contrast, over 1979 to 2004 by slowly the number of chicken tend to jump up till 250 grams per persons per weeks. On the other hands, since 1979 to 2004, fish was positioned in the lower level which since 1984 the consumption of it tend to decrease under 50 grams.
In the trajectory views, during 1979 to 1989 the consumption of beef was stood in the peakest level. Unfortunately, the consumption of chicken which in 1979 started from 150s grams per person per week, since 1994 to 2000 positioned in top level.
Afterwards, the consumption of lamb which in 1979 reach to 150s grams per person per week gravitate to decline significantly till in 2004 just was consumed by person under 100 grams per week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the items') or simply say ''most items''.
Suggestion: most of the items; most items
...k. Generally, throughout two decades most of items lean to decrease slightly. In contrast,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...med by person under 100 grams per week.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, in contrast, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60075258299 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9619464069 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138946696327 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734471881523 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686984104621 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104701015829 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586743004497 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.