The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented graph utilisation of fish and some different kinds of meat in the European country between the year 1979 and 2004.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that, consumption of chicken meat secured the highest position throughout the period, while fish meat consumption was the lowest.
As shown in the graph, in the 1979 around 150 grams of chicken meat was are by a person in a whole week. This figure was increased by 50 grams in the 1989. At the end of the period this figure will be reached at 250 grams. Consumption of beef meat was around 220 grams in the 1979. Between the year 1979 and 1989 there is some fluctuations is there. Around 140 grams in the 1990 and there will be decline uptown nearly 100 grams in the 2004.
It is clearly see a downward trend in lamb meat consumption. Starting with 150 grams of meat and reached at around 60 grams of meat consumption in the 2004 whereas in the fish consumption, starting with just above 50 grams and in the end of the period just below 50 grams consumption. Throughout the period, consumption of fish was constant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The presented graph utilisation of fish and some different kinds of meat in the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilisation of fish and some different kinds of meat in the European country be...
^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some fluctuations'?
Suggestion: there are some fluctuations
...he 1979. Between the year 1979 and 1989 there is some fluctuations is there. Around 140 grams in the 1990 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seen'.
Suggestion: seen
...y 100 grams in the 2004. It is clearly see a downward trend in lamb meat consumpti...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5641025641 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5020175948 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451282051282 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2177576584 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9090909091 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229032877882 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107222261224 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115641319234 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197641550012 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140812800074 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.