The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart show data about the primary exports in Southland in 2000 and 2017 and it also indicates a prediction for the 2025.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the international tourism will become the leading industry in 2025, althought dairy product will remain strong.
As regards International tourism, it was the greatest exports earner of the three industries, with about £8 billion in income in 2000. After that, there was a gradual increased by about £1 billion, and in 2017 it has reached approximately 9 billion. It is predicted that the revenue will continue to grow in 2025, reaching just under 10 billion.
In 2000,just around £7 billion of the income come from the dairy products. Then, there has been a significant increase and the profits for this year are about £10 billion. Experts are estimating that the sales of this area will drop slightly to around £9 billion.
Finally, meat products was the third industry in terms of sales compared to dairy products and tourism. In 2000 it gained about 6 billion but the figure for the current year has dropped marginally at approximatelly £5 billion. It is predicted that there will be a decrease in 2025 around £5 billion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was the third industry in terms of sales compared to dairy products and tourism. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, third, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92270531401 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60587609301 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570048309179 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4740185254 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.6363636364 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0887314448029 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409715887111 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372183186083 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611998745807 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409266324352 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.