The chat below give information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2014, and future projection of 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shown is about the main Exports in Southlands in year 2000 to 2025 with 25 years difference. The main exports included are International Tourism , Dairy Products and Meat products. The kind of graph used is bar graph and used billion pounds for the comparison.
In International Tourism, year 200 got the lowest income with approximately 8.1 billion. Through the years, its income is getting higher and reach its peak in the year 2025 having 9.9 billion.
Furthermore, for the Dairy Products, its income got the lowest pound in the year 2000 also that is having 7 billion only but happily increase in the year 2015 having 9.9 billion. It increases 2.9 in their income. However, it decreases its income to 9.5 billion in the year 2025.
Moreover, the Meat Products got its peak in year 2000 with flat 6 billion. Unfortunately their income is dramatically decreasing. For the year 2015 it decreases its income from 6 billion to around 5.7 billion then flat 5 billion in year 2025.
In my conclusion, International Tourism and Dairy Products earns more rather than meat Products may be because Meat Products is not that healthy and also, other countries have also meat products that they can produce in their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ports included are International Tourism , Dairy Products and Meat products. The k...
^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ism , Dairy Products and Meat products. The kind of graph used is bar graph and use...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94230769231 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65188339111 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7969775019 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6666666667 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.073596068822 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395795970186 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585805001117 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0511685547611 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673007850093 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.