The chat below gives information about Southland’s main exports in 2000, 2015 and future projection of 2025.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram shows data about the main exports of Southland in 2000, 2016 and forecast for the year 2025.
Generally speaking, it can be seen that international tourism was the main export for Southland and it is projected that it would exceed the other two types of export sector in 2025.
In the bar graph, just over 8 billion came from international tourism in southland in 2000. In this year two other sectors namely dairy products and meat products had bought 7 and 6 billion. After 16 years, dairy products were the highest earing from exports of Southland amounting 10 billion compared to 9 billion came from international tourism and meat products had bought 5,5 billion.
It is projected, international tourism would be the highest earing source for export sector in Southland in 2025 as it would be bring 10 billion compared to 9.5 billion from dairy products and 5 billion from meat products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The diagram shows data about the main ex...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., 2016 and forecast for the year 2025. Generally speaking, it can be seen that ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er two types of export sector in 2025. In the bar graph, just over 8 billion ca...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., dairy products were the highest earing from exports of Southland amounting 10 b...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... meat products had bought 5,5 billion. It is projected, international tourism w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88311688312 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61893670832 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9289355856 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 5.23603664747 6% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127400989411 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898558488757 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080933170942 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120870460154 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805395296102 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.