Compare the types of communication used in 1962 and in1982.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the information about the terms of percentage of three various kinds of communication which was used in two decades during 1962 and 1982.
In overall, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in all types of communications over the periods.
It can be seen from the information that communication via letter was most popular among people during 1962 which accounted at a half of the total percentage. Whilst, it declined dramatically and reached at one in ten after two decades. In contrast, between 1962, less than a fifth (15%) humans utilised computers for communicating. Interestingly, the proportion of computers for communicating had experienced a drastic increased of double at 30% from 1982.
The charts further prove that more than a third masses interested to expand phone for communicating with each other’s in the first given year. Furthermore, communication via phone attained a higher figure after twenty years. Lastly, a gradual rose of two fifth can be observed in the percentage of phone used for communication among people in the last period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, third, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32386363636 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21427741292 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6412938514 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138264198738 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566416417763 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368102685035 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090113361451 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239260186943 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.