The graph below shows average of carbon dioxide (CO2)emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden,Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The multi line graph illustrates the information about the level of carbon dioxide who released by per person in the four various regions such as the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in 4 decades during 1967 and 2007. In contrast, metric tonnes were measured in units.
In overall, the UK constituted a major for omitting CO2 whilst least amount of carbon dioxide was spreader by Portugal. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the average of per person which releasing CO2 in the all given regions over the periods.
With regards to the line graph, during given fourteen year periods, the British natives were most popular for the emission of carbon dioxide per person which accounted from nearly 11 metric tonnes to above 8 metric tonnes followed by Sweden ( over one in ten metric tonnes in the beginning of the year). Likewise, Sweden showing ups and down figure and following zig zag trend sat less than 6 metric tonnes in the end of the period.
The chart further proves that Italian people accounted for over a 4 metric tonnes for spreading CO2 by per person during 1967 and experienced a little less than a two fold rise to approximately 8 metric tonnes in the last decade. Lastly, the amount of per person to released carbon dioxide observed at negligible at 1% between 1967 in Portugal. After this, it started continuously increased dramatically and reached to peak level at around 6 metric tonnes in the last ten years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...above 8 metric tonnes followed by Sweden over one in ten metric tonnes in the beg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, lastly, likewise, so, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84462151394 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52226793312 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549800796813 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1810138848 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.111111111 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229488614146 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985569490164 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925383887769 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156653581127 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717992874919 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.