The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries for the period 1960 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries, for the period 1960-2000.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and, make comparisons where relevant.

The given two-line graph illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of smoking and alcohol in litres which taken by people daily in four various regions such as USA, Japan, Holland and Turkey in four decades during 1960 and 2000.

In overall, Holland constituted a major for smokers and alcohol drinkers whilst least amount of both items were consumed by American and Turkish. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in the amount of people who smoke and drink regularly in all the nations over the periods.

With regards to an initial chart, between 1960 and 1980, the Holland natives was most popular for smoking every day which accounted from nearly three-fifths to above twofifths followed by Japan (approximately a half). After this, in the upcoming 2 decades, the percentage of humans who smoke daily was started decreased dramatically at over 30% in the both countries. Likewise, The America accounted for 40% for regular smokers during 1960 and experienced a little less than two- fold declined to approximately a fifth in the end of the period.

The second graph proves that an amount of Holland and USA for drinking alcohol in litres were found 11%, 10%, 9%, 8% and 4% respectively between 1980, 1970 and 1960. In contrast, the two given regions were showing ups and downs figure and following in zig zag trends in the remaining twenty years. Lastly, alcohol consumption in litres per person for Turkey remained relatively constant at 2% in all given years.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (25 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, second, so, in contrast, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.052 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61602752279 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5960402242 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196613118951 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792037263617 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462072401312 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113097321015 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390945118227 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.