The two graphs below show the percentage of smokers and the consumption of alcohol in litres in selected countries,for the period 1960-2000.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two poly line graphs illustrate the information about the terms of proportion of intake smoking and alcohol in litres regularly in four various chosen regions such as USA, Japan, Holland, Turkey which was in four decades during 1960 and 2000.
In overall, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in all nations where people consumed these items daily over the periods. However, USA constituted a least for drinking those things.
With regards to an initial graph, a vast amount of smokers can be found in the Holland which accounted at around three-fifths in 1960. Similarly, it starts decreased dramatically at above a third in the end of the periods followed by Japan who started from approximately a half to a little less than a third between given fourteen years times. In contrast, a two fifth people of the America was smokers in the beginning of the period. After this, the percentage of humans who were smoking in the USA continuously reducing at nearly a fifth in remained years.
The second graph proves that Turkey and Holland showing a ups and downs trend and following in a zig zag manners which had experienced between 4 per persons litres to 10 per person litres in the all given periods. Lastly, an amount of alcohol drunk masses by daily in the America remained relatively constant at 2 per person litres from 1960 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... proves that Turkey and Holland showing a ups and downs trend and following in a ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, second, similarly, so, third, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88841201717 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62827095475 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605150214592 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6318670422 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170771838428 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663063671808 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404872555085 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943997725491 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352296967321 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.