The Comparison of Energy Production in France
This pie chart below showed the different types of energy resources which produced by France in two different times between 1995 to 2005.
In 1995 the highest resources energy production was coal and the second was gas. Energy from petro was in the third position. They were three biggest energy resources production at that year which the values consecutively were 29.80%, 29.63% and 29.27%. nuclear energy was fourth and other energy was the last of list. Nuclear and other resources energy far below from the three biggest that were described before. Both of the energy just covered each 6.40% and 4.90%.
For next decade on 2005 coal energy resources was still at the first which the raise about 2% from 1995. Gas energy also still at the second position which grew under 1%. At the third place it was petro energy but this went down deeply almost 10%. The fourth and fifth are nuclear and other energy resources which occurred biggest increase more than 5% to both of them.
In general it cn be said that between 1995 and 2005 coal energy was the most produced and other energy was the little. In that periods for energy was grew up except petro which went down deeply. And for valuable changes, other energy resources had biggest and gas had lowest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
This pie chart below showed the different types of ene...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...1995 to 2005. In 1995 the highest resources energy production was coal and the seco...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nuclear
...utively were 29.80%, 29.63% and 29.27%. nuclear energy was fourth and other energy was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...was the last of list. Nuclear and other resources energy far below from the three biggest...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'occurred the biggest'.
Suggestion: occurred the biggest
...uclear and other energy resources which occurred biggest increase more than 5% to both of them. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
... little. In that periods for energy was grew up except petro which went down deeply....
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83105022831 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02045378105 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48401826484 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9278406919 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5714285714 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6428571429 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 3.70975609756 377% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250124063755 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10577342412 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329654449774 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159094370259 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422798424594 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.