The line chart compares the weekly consumption per person of fish, lamb, beef and chicken in a European country over the period from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear that varying numbers among four breeds of meat consumption during 25 years. While Chicken gained more favour which had a continuously increased, Beef and Lamb lost it is market saw a decrease. What else, Fish had a stable consumption over that period.
In 1979, Beef accounted for the majority consumption of meat with a figure of 210 grams. Subsequently, Lamb had a similar consumption as Beef stood at second highest with 150 grams per person per week. Following that, Fish had the minority market, approximately 60 grams. However, Beef saw a sudden fluctuation in the next decade, and Chicken saw an increase with the rate of 5 grams per year. While Lamb met a moderately decreased and Fish saw a negligible change.
In 1989, Chicken took place Beef as the highest consumption among four breeds of meat. To be species, 200 grams per person per week, a little cent higher than Beef, and chicken consumption continuously soar over the remaining period, By contrast, Beef met a slump and stay at around 100 grams in 2004, which was less than two times than Chicken at that time. Moving to the remaining two meat, Lamb had a similar trend to Beef and stay at around 50 grams. While Fish remained at the same level compared with two decades ago, which was under 50 grams.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73306772908 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51856490011 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529880478088 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1346685866 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194069950089 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090172137421 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757386431149 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153277191589 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479729977926 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
express a contemporary…
express a contemporary downtrend and contact the former sentence: after which it experienced a sudden drop of 50 before increasing to about 230 in 1984.
express fluctuation before a specific year: there were small fluctuations until 1989.
express one is down and the other is up: while the former declined gradually as it reached approximately 60 in the last year.
the latter saw considerable growth and outstripped beef consumption in 1989, peaking at 250 in 2004.
experienced a small fall of about 10 over the period
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73306772908 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51856490011 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529880478088 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1346685866 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194069950089 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090172137421 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757386431149 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153277191589 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479729977926 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.