Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dollars spent on various activities per week while the pie chart shows the amount spent on curricular activities.
The table depicts the amount of dollars utilised by Australian teens on weekly basis on different items in three years whereas the pie chart illustrates the division of money spent for educational purposes.
Food was the major source of money utilisation with $150 in year 2001 followed by an incline of $10 in 2002 and remained same in next year. In 2001, teens spent $100 per week on clothes which increased by an average of $1 in each following year. $35 weekly were used on entertainment and the spending grew by $5 per annum till 2003. Least amount of money was used on cosmetics which was $20 in first year followed by an increase of $10 in next year and $2 in third year.
More than half of the proportion goes into the account of books and slightly less than quarter on internet services. Projects takes 18℅ of total curricular budget followed by a least of 3℅ which is invested in memberships.
Overall, All commodities showed rise in expenditure with coming year and food is main source of money utilisation. However, books requires great proportion of money for educational purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clothes which increased by an average of in each following year. 5 weekly were us...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n entertainment and the spending grew by per annum till 2003. Least amount of mon...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Least'.
Suggestion: The Least
... spending grew by per annum till 2003. Least amount of money was used on cosmetics w...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wed by an increase of 0 in next year and in third year. More than half of the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8128342246 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67608458274 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1041018839 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169505555682 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066193254621 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715471523586 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100425592795 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821353191932 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.