Design of Landfill for modern Household Waste construction. Write an essay by reporting the main feature and make a comparison where possible.
The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste.
This process diagram outline the whole construction idea about landfill for cotemporary household waste. As an overall development started from a small hole formation to use and finally closing of structure.
The first step is the building of a landfill that started from a man-made hole that is created under which there are naturals rocks. The further hole is created in a big hole as a drainage tank which will store water, other than that a wall of clay which outlines the man-made hole above which another wall is laid of synthetic. Drainage pipes lie above the double wall.
The next step is to use it and fill it with extra material from which liquid absorbed by clay and move down through hole while other wast products fill the gap.
When the hole filled with household waste the constructed landfill covered with clay and gasses from pipes moved for other uses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-11 | Farwa Nasir | 61 | view |
- The chart below show the information about changalles people face when live in other countries Summaries the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- The restoration of older buildings in major cities throughout the world involve enormous expenditures This money would bring more benefits if it was used to provide new housing and road development To what extend do you agree or not 56
- The line graph below gives the information about the number of visitor to three London museums between Jun and September 2013 Summarize the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparison where possible 73
- the map shows the changes in Pentland from 1980 to 2008 Summarise the information and make comparisons where possible 61
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s habits of tea and coffee buying and drinking in five cities of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make a comparison where possible 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82119205298 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31026183951 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0156435394 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137466078337 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767874511468 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089368189893 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108913319511 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827090852986 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.