The diagram below gives information of transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarize the information by reporting main features and make comparison where possible.
The pie chart given below provides data about utilization of personal vehicles and other form of transport system the categories are cars, light train, taxi and bus. While information in table is of reasons why people choose particular kind of transportation in city of Edmonton.
If we look at chart its clear that private owned transport forms are less popular among people rather than private cars. And these used to reach places where reaching on time is important such as school and office.
The red part in diagram indicated as cars usage in one specific city, which account 45 percent almost half of population have their own vehicles. And yellow part of chart describes the light train transit advantage for Edmonton people as public transportation service, that 35 percent individual take benefit from. Next two type are Bus and taxis are least utilized form each account only 10 percent.
In table one specific question for what purposes people are using cars highest percent is of employees which have to commute their work place on exact time, 55 percent more than half reasons that encourage people to travel at cars. Another two routine activities which demand timely arrival are taking children from school and business 40 percent and 45 percent respectively. Although, lowest use of cars observed for leisure activities and shopping 15 percent each by Edmonton people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'cars the highest'.
Suggestion: cars the highest
...tion for what purposes people are using cars highest percent is of employees which have to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the lowest'.
Suggestion: , the lowest
...nt and 45 percent respectively. Although, lowest use of cars observed for leisure activi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11453744493 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48008622617 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656387665198 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1941743454 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.1 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132080213247 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558391920685 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443824136403 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823454706851 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329521986144 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.