the diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

the diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram demonstrates how a home smokery works. It is manifest from the graph that this process is devide into three stage.

In this machine, mostly process are under ground level and only cooking process is on floor level. Lid is open in the first level because of natural air is enter by this lid and this air gone to the second stage of this process.In this part, lid is close on the top and fire is burning below this lid at underground level, this fire burning by using logs.This logs are adding by lid for do more burning fire with smoke.In addition to it, this smoke is pressurise by fresh air which come by first opening lid than this air gave pressure to smoke and this smoke travel in third stage by a narrow pipe for cooking in the cook box, which is situated above floor. Finally, food item cook by smoke, so, this process is known as home smokery.

Overall, it is clearly seen that mostly work doing by fresh air and smoke of fire.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (57 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...one to the second stage of this process.In this part, lid is close on the top and ...
^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... level, this fire burning by using logs.This logs are adding by lid for do more burn...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...lid for do more burning fire with smoke.In addition to it, this smoke is pressuris...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, third, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38983050847 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05018588262 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 180.482378333 43.030603864 419% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 129.5 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0443509589023 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645039516792 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124709371133 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649368296243 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825600771238 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.