The diagram below show the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening) describe the information presented below, comparing results for men and women in the categories shown suggest reasons for what you see.
The given chart reveals the information about average hours of unpaid work done by men and women. The data is calibrated in the form of bar graph. It is clear and coherent representation.
It is an evident that, women having more than 3, 1-2 or without children doing more unpaid work per week as compare to men.
To begin with, it seem that ; women having no child doing 30% unpaid household practices which is 12% more than men.
Moving forward, family having one or two children; same as in case of family with no children men contribute in unpaid work about 34% less as compare to women doing 53% approximately. This is because of child care doing by women.
Apart from that, men and women having three or more than three children; then women doing above 55% unpaid house hold work per week, while percentage of men for doing same task is only 18%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...as compare to men. To begin with, it seem that ; women having no child doing 30% ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ontribute in unpaid work about 34% less as compare to women doing 53% approximatel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, while, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6038961039 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30374079361 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4030685071 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162575559523 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080338469432 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851409420137 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112177738419 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533908804663 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.