The diagrams illustrate how changes took place at West Park Secondary School from its construction 1950 to 2010.
Overall, catagories such as playground, main road and building block remain unchanged throughout the period whereas farmland and houses were replaced by car park, science block and sports field.
From 1950 to 1980, the West Park Secondary School experienced plenty of changes. In 1980, houses were demolished in which car park and science block were constructed. By the same token, farm land was disappeared from the scene and sports field came into account. Whilst there was no differences on playground.
In comparison to 1980, 2010s school witnessed dramatic changes on its structure. Due to extravagant increment on the area of car park resulted to adjust two block namely sports field and playground in area equal to 1980s playground size. On the flip side, science block and school main building positioned in same place as they were in 1980s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'block' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'blocks'.
Suggestion: blocks
...area of car park resulted to adjust two block namely sports field and playground in a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...g positioned in same place as they were in 1980s.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, whereas, such as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21153846154 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64210676154 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8961090152 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207802887511 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100540401653 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11702304226 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159494304326 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129521810949 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.