The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The figures given illustrate the changes that occurred at West Park Secondary School from its formation until the date with intervals of exactly 30 years in each. Overall, it shows that houses have been totally replaced with science blocks, and, farmland turned into the car park. Over time playgrounds shared areas with sports fields.
According to the diagrams, in 1950, there were houses near the school area with equal land of farmland. Space for school buildings and playgrounds was kind of qual to each other. But in 1980, after 30 years, it can be seen that the houses have been totally replaced with car parking and science block. The sports field replaced farmland while the school (main building) and the playground remained in the same location.
Exactly after 30 years, in 2010, the Science block and school building remained in the same place while the car parking area took the whole sports field of 1980. The sports field has been adjusted in nearly 1/3 portion of the playground area which made the playground way somehow smaller than it was.
To sum up, houses and farmland are totally replaced by the Science block and car park whereas the sports field has been added to the area of the playground.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (4 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, so, whereas, while, kind of, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19677345429 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.44357705 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121897180588 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557895286346 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485744332284 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806078496319 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05138852844 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.