The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
summarize the information.
The maps show the changes in West Park Secondary School from 1950 to 2010.
As you can see in the pictures, in 1950 the area in the left side of school was occupied by houses and there was a play ground in the back of the school and a farmland near by.
In 1980 a science block was added to the school complex taking some of the former houses space. The remaining space was turned into a car park.
The farmland area in 1950, located behind the houses,was changed to sport fields in 1980. Furthermore, in 2010 the car park was expanded even more, taking the previous farmland area and where used to be a sports field in 1980. A new sports field was constructed in the playground area, taking a portion of it. As we can see by comparing the maps, the new sports fields is much smaller than the one in 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...n the back of the school and a farmland near by. In 1980 a science block was added to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... was added to the school complex taking some of the former houses space. The remaining spac...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , was
... area in 1950, located behind the houses,was changed to sport fields in 1980. Furthe...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 655.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25324675325 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19196965839 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538961038961 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.148140936 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.875 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161387443686 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892466141036 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10700020242 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140334500982 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129056251534 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.37 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.