The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of student attending to 4 different school type in 2000, 2005, and 2009. According to table in 2000 voluntary-controlled schools were the most attended with 52%. Even though its numbers dropped to 38% in 2005 they still had highest number of attendance. But in 2009 they were overthrown by community schools which reached 58% percent. Before this, the least number of pupils went to community schools in 2000 alongside with specialist schools. It rose to 38 percent by 2005, although wasn't ranked first untill 2009.
Specialist schools were the least attended type of school in every year and followed a slight downward path from 12% in 2000 to 11% in 2005 to 10% in 2009.
Grammar schools were ranked second, only behind voluntary-controlled schools, in 2000. But were left behind by community schools and ranked the third in 2005 and 2009 with 19% and 12% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...chools were the most attended with 52%. Even though its numbers dropped to 38% in 2005 they...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...mbers dropped to 38% in 2005 they still had highest number of attendance. But in 2009 they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 522, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...It rose to 38 percent by 2005, although wasnt ranked first untill 2009. Specialist s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03311258278 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97115646034 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569536423841 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4083450351 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4444444444 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7777777778 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184272251907 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931668170048 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654524648295 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134714013834 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417741011301 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.