The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates the percentage of people attending in four types of schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, attendance of secondary schools in all categories decreased throughout the period except community schools which had experienced an upward trend.
In terms of voluntary-controlled schools which accounted for the highest proportion between 2000 (52%) and 2005 (38%).
In 2000, there was not a great deal of difference in specialist and community schools' attendance, however, compared to these categories of schools, grammar school had two times more students participation. On the other hand, in 2005, the least contribution was on specialist schools at nearly one-tenth, while grammar schools and community schools accounted for 19% and 32% respectively.
By contrast, the sector of community schools was contributed to the highest percentage of attendance in 2005 (more than half of all attendance). Moreover, all the other three types of schools accounted for less than a fifth of participation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ools, grammar school had two times more students participation. On the other hand, in 20...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for less than a fifth of participation.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62091503268 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27210196784 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3544159712 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200285839244 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111980169846 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754400167867 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138634677809 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754136870194 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.