Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree?
Social networking sites, for instance, Facebook are thought by some to have had a detrimental effect on individual people as well as society and the local community. However, I believe that such sites are mainly beneficial to the individual people, I agree that social networking sites have had a destructive impact on society and local communities.
With regards to individuals, the impact that online social media have had on each individual person has clear advantages. Firstly, people from different countries are brought together through such social networking sites such as Facebook, whereas before the development of technology and social media, people rarely met and barely got the chance to socialize with anyone from outside of their immediate circle and community. Secondly, Facebook also providing group conversations which offer individuals to share and communicate people with either similar or controversial interests.
On the other hand, the effect that Facebook and other social-related networking site have had on the damaging effect on the local community. Rather than individual taking part in their local community, they prefer to communicate in people online. Consequently, the people within the local communities have no longer forming a close and supportive relationship. Furthermore, society as a whole is becoming disjointed and fragmented as people spent their most of the time in online; they addicted to maintaining their relationship with people who they have never met face to face even they are unlikely to ever meet in the future.
To conclude, although social networking sites are brought individual together, they have no loner the same favourable to the local community. The local community always has a negative influence on social networking sites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53284671533 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95863646914 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8337989601 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7272727273 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332184914994 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144640692825 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757737509371 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230200116634 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705495061748 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.