Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing. In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing. In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. disadvantages?

The modern technology that our society gas access to today could give authorities the ability to be aware of what we do or the things that we say to each other. For instance, they could listen to our conversations on phone or track our location. The necessity of these actions and how it affects people is something that needs to be analysis.
The concerns around safety might have lead some people to sense that government needs to monitor civilians. For example, if they receive some information through this monitoring showing that someone is planning to commit a crime, they would be able to stop them before the person hurts anyone, physically and financially, or at least minimize the damage. But I don't think this justifies the invasion of privacy that this system is based on. Also, in some cases it is really necessary, specially, if lives are in danger.
Monitoring people, checking where they go and eavesdropping on their private conversations are direct attack to their personal space which is a basic human right. Plus, the fact that they are going to do it without their knowledge or permission breaks several laws.
In my opinion, spying on normal people is extremely unethical and wrong in many levels. In some cases that they really suspect that someone is about to do something or an individual who has a long history of criminal records and is suspected to do it again it might be necessary within reason. But beyond that I believe it is not acceptable.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... or at least minimize the damage. But I dont think this justifies the invasion of pr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, at least, for example, for instance, in my opinion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82283464567 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63974836614 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4261439602 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204208336631 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626963904644 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534946533624 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105601412698 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488763257871 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.