some people work for the same organisations all their work life. other think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Working is a major part of adult life. It is the main source of income for many people and can require a big portion of our time. So it is important that we make it as tolerable as possible.
Some people are more conservative. They prefer to learn how to do something perfectly an stick to doing it. They rather be in the same environment that they are use to. It is harder for them to break their habits. We expect from these kind of people to stay in the same organization in their whole life. Learn the ways and rules of the same place and try to get better at it.
On the other hand, there are others that prefer change. They might get bored easily. These group are usually willing to take a risk. Maybe they are doing fine in their current job but still want to change it in order to be more successful even at the risk of some drawbacks. In my opinion, these type of individuals are more creative.
Despite all these personality differences, I think it sometime it is important to leave a unfulfilling job that makes you unhappy or stressful even in you are afraid of change and other options. Also, it is sometimes neccessary to be able to choose and finish the things you started instead of quitting in the middle.
In general, I believe that working for the same organisation or changing it over your work life both can be a good or bad thing depending on the person and situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | milad69692ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Subhashree22 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Maanya 09 | 73 | view |
- some people work for the same organisations all their work life. other think that it is better to work for different organisations. 56
- The pie chart show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand. Summarize 61
- the chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000,2018 and 2025. summarise. 73
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 63
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... to learn how to do something perfectly an stick to doing it. They rather be in th...
^^
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e in the same environment that they are use to. It is harder for them to break thei...
^^^
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...m to break their habits. We expect from these kind of people to stay in the same organizat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nk it sometime it is important to leave a unfulfilling job that makes you unhappy...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, as to, i think, in general, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36538461538 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45567510813 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565384615385 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6729028623 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.7647058824 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303330505679 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790437877539 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086751140312 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156284981568 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976112322535 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 13.0946893788 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.47 12.4159519038 60% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.