The diagram below show the process of making a water clock
The diagram illustrate the process for making a water clock . It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that the water clock is made by using the various materials ; tap water, straw, tape, stand, glue,and plastic bottles. In this process water plays an important role from starting to end.
To begin with, water comes from the tap into the plastic bottle which is tie with the stand with the help of tape. A small hole is created at the bottom of the bottle. Moreover another hole is created at the side of the bottom of the bottle to fill top bottle to overflow. Straw is attached to that hole with the help of glue and maintain the constant level. Nextly cover the hole with the fingure to fill the bottle with water Further the head cut off bottle placed at the bottom of the stand, In addition to that mention the level per minute in the plastic bottle open the hole of the first bottle and water start drop into the second bottle. When the bottle becomes empty then repeated the process again. It is act as water clock.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The diagram illustrate the process for making a water clock . ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ate the process for making a water clock . It is clear and coherent representation...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ls ; tap water, straw, tape, stand, glue,and plastic bottles. In this process water ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...is created at the bottom of the bottle. Moreover another hole is created at the side of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and maintain the constant level. Nextly cover the hole with the fingure to fill ...
^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ater start drop into the second bottle. When the bottle becomes empty then repeated ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, then, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47120418848 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09567398362 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.255354284 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6363636364 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21698635423 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118724040492 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16312112117 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240291816446 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144407623765 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'illustrates'.
Suggestion: illustrates
The diagram illustrate the process for making a water clock . ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ate the process for making a water clock . It is clear and coherent representation...
^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ls ; tap water, straw, tape, stand, glue,and plastic bottles. In this process water ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...is created at the bottom of the bottle. Moreover another hole is created at the side of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and maintain the constant level. Nextly cover the hole with the fingure to fill ...
^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ater start drop into the second bottle. When the bottle becomes empty then repeated ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, then, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47120418848 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.09567398362 2.65546596893 79% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.255354284 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6363636364 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21698635423 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118724040492 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16312112117 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240291816446 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144407623765 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.